You may understand the goal that won game 1, cool, Ryan Kesler made a great play to stay on side and a great pass that Tim Thomas had no shot on.
You sort of understand the goal that won game 2; Thomas was overly aggressive in handling the puck and Alex Burrows outmuscled Zdeno Chara for a wrap-around to win it in overtime. It was the good type of aggression by Burrows beating the bad type of aggression from Thomas. Fine whatever.
Yet after Maxim Lapierre netted the game winner that bounced off of Thomas when it looked like he got there in time, and it was the only tally in another classic 1-0 Vancouver victory, you have to wonder if maybe or not the Bruins are snake-bitten.
Consider this if you will; in games 1,2 & 5 the Bruins could’ve won them as easily as they lost. They out played Vancouver in game 1 had a 2-1 lead in the third period of game 2 and outshot the Canucks 31-24 in game 5. Yet lost all three games on goals that you could call either fluky or great effort.
In all three games Thomas has been as stellar as he was in the games in Boston. He made 3 or 4 saves that made you shake your head like he always does, yet unlike in Boston he’s been the victim of three pretty lame goals that were each the deciding tally in the game. Last night’s winner he was able to stop with his right arm before his momentum carried the puck into the night and set off frenzy at Rogers Arena. It’s hardly the way that Thomas should’ve envisioned losing a game on such a cheap goal.
However, its not like Bruins didn’t have their own share of chances. David Krejci had a shot at point blank range that Roberto Luongo was able to stop in the first period, as did Chris Kelly, Brad Marchand and other Bruins throughout the night. Luongo was simply amazing though. He shook of the harsh, yet deserved, criticism from the media after his two stinkers in Boston and played lights out in game 5. Luongo stood on his head and kept the Canucks in the contest when the Bruins were finding excellent scoring chances in front of him. He was back to being to being the one time best goalie in hockey and the guy that led team Canada to the gold medal last year.
We should also praise the Canucks as a team for finally taking it to the Bruins last night. For the last two games we watched Boston basically rape and pillage Vancouver without any retaliation, last night Burrows, Alex Edler and Chris Higgins were leading the charge in their physical assault of the Bruins as Vancouver outhit Boston 47-27. This time they were the aggressors and they put Boston in a bind with their physicality.
Which begs this question… What did happen to Boston last night?
Sure they could’ve won the game and they had their chances, but this didn’t look like the same Boston team that wreaked havoc in games 3 & 4. They were missing that next gear so to speak. At times in Boston the Bruins seemed like they had invented the 10th and 11th gear as they just kept taking it to Vancouver. Last night they looked stuck in the 3rd gear. They didn’t have the same spring in their step and it showed in the performances from Milan Lucic and Brad Marchand who went from agitators to innocent bystanders.
Maybe it was the home ice advantage that boosted the B’s spirits. If that’s the case then maybe we should expect more of what we saw in games 3 & 4 on Monday night for game 6 as Boston looks to stave off elimination.
If they do win will they have what it takes to come back to Vancouver and close out the Canucks? We know that the home crowd can take a team to different heights in the playoffs but for Boston a possible game 7 would mean finding another gear without assistance and as of right now they seem to be a home crowd only kind of team.
That crowd will play a big part with the Bruins going back to Boston on the brink of losing the Stanley Cup. But if we see more of the same that we have in Boston, doesn’t mean the same for a possible game 7 in Vancouver?
If it does then look for another brilliant Tim Thomas performance to go to waste and another sad way for the Bruins to come up empty handed.